some definitions

Malice aforethought
Adverse possession
([update] There is a point but please read sequentially)

"In law, acquiescence occurs when a person knowingly stands by without raising any objection to the infringement of their rights, while someone else unknowingly and without malice aforethought makes a claim on their rights. Consequently, the person whose rights are infringed loses the ability to make a claim against the infringer, or succeed in an injunction suit due to the infringer's conduct. The term is most generally a kind of "permission" given by silence or passiveness.


The common law doctrine of estoppel by acquiescence is applied when one party gives legal notice to a second party of a fact or claim, and the second party fails to challenge or refute that claim within a reasonable time. The second party is said to have acquiesced to the claim, and is estopped from later challenging it, or making a counterclaim. The doctrine is similar to, and often applied with, estoppel by laches."

"Silence is acquiescence (aka. silent acquiescence and acquiescence by silence) is a related doctrine that can mean, and have the legal effect, that when confronted with a wrong or an act that can be considered a tortious act, where one’s silence may mean that one accepts or permits such acts without protest or claim thereby loses rights to a claim of any loss or damage.[2]"

"Malice aforethought is the "premeditation" or "predetermination" (with malice) that was required as an element of some crimes in some jurisdictions,[1] and a unique element for first-degree or aggravated murder in a few.[1]"

"Adverse possession is a process by which premises can change ownership. It is governed by statute[1] concerning the title to real property (land and the fixed structures built upon it). By adverse possession, title to another's real property can be acquired without compensation, by holding the property in a manner that conflicts with the true owner's rights for a specified period. For example, squatter's rights are a specific form of adverse possession.


•Dispossession not under force of arms. Dispossession by armed invasion does not establish a claim of adverse possession against the true owner."


[update] Discussion:

a) In general, know your own rights, and if infringed, OR someone aggresses against you, speak up, loudly, and make a public record.

b) In particular, the above is to show that Israel (=IL) illegally squats on mostly Palestinian land/property, and can *never* have legal title to that land/property (before WW2, the Zs had managed to purchase ~6% of pre-UNGA181 Palestine; that much is legally theirs). Thus, as illegal squatters AND as the mostly Palestinian ELO/Os expressed their rightful claims before the Zionists' aggressive invasion began in earnest, the entity IL can never claim legitimacy, since they do not and never can own the land they improperly dispossessed from the ELO/Os - unless those ELO/Os surrender = roll over, which is of course, the despicable Zs' long-term aim = the risible 'peace process.'

My advice to Palestinian refugees (i.e. all driven = dispossessed from pre-UNGA181 Palestine), their heirs and successors: Never surrender!



[1] deceive  v. (-ving) 1 make (a person) believe what is false; purposely mislead. 2 be unfaithful to, esp. sexually. 3 use deceit.  deceive oneself persist in a mistaken belief.  deceiver n. [POD]

[2] lie2  -n. 1 intentionally false statement (tell a lie). 2 something that deceives. -v. (lies, lied, lying) 1 tell a lie or lies. 2 (of a thing) be deceptive.  give the lie to show the falsity of (a supposition etc.). [Old English] [ibid.]

[3] conspiracy  n. (pl. -ies) 1 secret plan to commit a crime; plot. 2 conspiring. [Latin: related to *conspire] [ibid.]


ELO/Os = erstwhile legal owner/occupiers

I/J/Z-plex; illegitimate IL squats on genocidally ethnically-cleansed = improperly alienated, mainly Palestinian ELO/Os' land/property = IL is an un-remedied crime-scene and *all* I/J/Z-plex (except any actively opposing) are guilty; sole remedy = reparations = revest where possible, adequate = acceptable recompense where not + *sincere* apology

M/I/C/$4a†-plex = military, industrial, Congress (US-speak for parliament); $ = banksters, 4 = 4th estate = MSM+PFBCs, 'a' = academia incl. think-tanks, † = the churches.

MSM = mainstream media (print and broadcast), aka 'corrupt&venal'

neoliberalism = 'economic rationalism,' 'supply-side,' (wicked) privatisations, 'small govt.' = minimised to no égalité etc. + globalisation = wage arbitration etc. = <1% rips off 99%+

PFBCs = publicly-financed broadcasters, like the AusBC

ppp-dd'd = pushed-propaganda paradigm dumbed-down

PRopaganda = PR + propaganda, usual qualifier: 'lying'

SQSHsO = snivelling quisling sycophantic hangers-on

the Enlightenment well summarised by liberté, égalité, fraternité

US-MMH = Media (aka press, radio + TV), Madison Ave., Hollywood

US&/Zs = the US of A and/or Zionists; sometimes indistinguishable

XS-CO2-C*4 = excess CO2 climate-change catastrophe cliff
 (in the short term at least, one-way)

Zionism (latest post-Jabotinsky, '23) = perpetual aggressive war

raison d'être

truth +
= peace

To collect *facts*, hopefully to prevent lies being posted to forums by psychopathic trolls. Some p-dates have been deliberately moved back in time, so past events may be entered on the date they occurred.

Musing: "The squeaky wheel gets the grease;" the world's biggest problems attract most attention. Starting here with the Zionist rogue-regime's improper dispossession of most of pre-UNGA181 Palestine, otherwise known as ethnic cleansing using genocidal methods = mass-murder for soil.

The US, the world's equal worst rogue-regime will also be touched upon; while they make aggressive war in the name of democracy, a risible lie, in reality they are pursuing resources for power/hegemony plus economic-rent = more mass-murder, mostly for oil.

The material 'in here' is based on the AusBC forum "unleashed," whereby there are at least 3 problems, a) the moderators often unjustifiably censor, b) comment size is limited (200 preferred, ~500 max. words), and c) the r-whingers and z-trolls appear to get favoured treatment. In a PFBC = publicly financed broadcaster, (a) and (c) are indefensible offences, against both democracy and justice.

As a non-trivial aside, let me put that, another way: Deliberately misinforming us, we the people, by an organisation paid for by our taxes, formed with the precise objective of informing a so-called 'democratic' electorate is outright treason, and should be appropriately punished. One proof that the AusBC does mislead us, we the people is their long-term treatment of Israel, a proven rogue-state (Ben-Gurion(1936-39): "We are the attackers and the Arabs ... own the land"), but not called out as such by the AusBC, so far for the term of my natural life.

Trigger event;

kenj :

03 May 2013 11:54:19am
This topic has been done to death and all the facts have been put many times. The Right wing commentators just lick their wounds, ignore the facts and then come back and post the same proven falsehoods in later comment threads.

None of resolutions 687, 660 or 1441 provided a basis for military action against Iraq.

No respect at all for this nonsense.
Me: Agreed. So we do something about it ...