[drafting - intro to come]
1)
aletheia ·
Background (surely known to some, sadly not to most):
Consider means, motive, and opportunity + modus operandi, presence & premeditation &
cui bono? means: Meir, ~$US50mio for arms
motive: Herzl, Zionism
opportunity:
Balfour, Holocaust, UNGA181 (text: "an area ... shall be evacuated" -
which *no* power on this planet may so order)
modus operandi: Jabotinsky = "Iron Wall" = perpetual aggressive war = murdering violence
presence: before Herzl little, then immigration, partly illegal = alien invasion
premeditation: latest 1897, 1st Z-conference Basel
cui bono? only Zs; US helps, partly against own interests
proof;
Ben-Gurion(1936-39): “We must see the situation for what it is. ... But
in the political field we are the attackers and the Arabs are those
defending themselves. They are living in the country and own the land,
..."
proof, terrorism: King David Hotel bombing
proof, ethnic cleansing: Plan Dalet, ~700,000 forced from homes
proof, genocidal methods: Deir Yassin & etc., Gaza '08/9, continues
observation: erstwhile legal owner/occupiers displaced by violence
observation: Israel squats on improperly alienated land/property
observation: a war between recent immigrants and long-time natives is neither a 'civil' war, nor of 'independence’ - see next
summary: fits description of "supreme international crime"
further;
UNGA181 specified Palestinian state, still none.
UNGA194 specified Palestinian right of return, still out.
UNGA273 cites 181 & 194, *accepted* by Israel, *still* not honoured
UNSC242 inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war
Q: What is wrong with this picture?
Q: Why does the world tolerate it?
Q: What if anything am I missing?
Compare
to a burglary/home invasion with deadly violence; SWAT teams are sent
in, the perpetrators brought to justice and all stolen property revests,
with reparations paid by those found guilty. Why are we waiting?
2)
aletheia ·
It's not what they say (so much) as what they do.
'Normally'
I would not even open an article containing such 'baby-names' as this
one does, but I was 'hooked' by the possibility that not only had Obama
engaged Netanyahu, but had 'pulled a swifty' - and bested not just
Netanyahu but, since the two are one, Obama had bested the whole of the
I/J/Z-plex to boot; the proposition seems preposterous on its face.
1st,
'baby-names' as an example of *enemy* language; Lakoff says that IF you
use their language or special terms, here a totally unwarranted
familiarity, THEN you enter the enemy's frame, at great if not fatal
disadvantage to yourself.
2ndly, getting Netanyahu to apologise
and agree to reparations definitely is a step in the correct direction
(it's *part* of what's required
vis-à-vis the ethnically cleansed
erstwhile legal owner/occupiers of Palestine, the main part being the
revesting of all stolen land/property, best by exiting the region), but
any 'victory' here is minor-to-none, since:
3rdly, as
some/many/most may know, the road to Teheran *allegedly* passes through
Damascus. TR is in NATO, it is conduiting arms and (Al-Qaeda!)
mercenaries into Syria, the (mostly?) Serbian[*] arms are being financed by
Saudi Arabia, and *Qatar*; here a comment from elsewhere on ICH:
"The
agreement, signed last year, between Iran, Iraq, and Syria, to build a
gas pipeline, with terminal on the Syrian coast, evoked an absolute
hissy fit in Qatar, in that the IIS gas pipeline plan would render
obsolete its own gas-line project with Turkey and the EU. Hence Qatar's
eager and active participation in the destruction of Syria."
Sooo,
finally, geopolitics rears its ugly head (again? No, still), as a
continuation of some 'great game,' not in itself a game but rather more
of the same-old-same-old, namely mass-murder for spoil. Surprise! And
this x-spy walks all around it, apparently not noticing? On the whole
quite telling, really. TR gets this mention, possibly designed to cause
outrage somewhere:
"... that Turkey is an actual ally and
critical to American regional interests while Israel is not, though it
was likely expressed more diplomatically than that." Conclusion: A
Giraldi psyop.
@peacenik: "And why do Americans apparently accept this crazy state of affairs?"
A: Because ~315mio US citizens have as good as *no* influence, only the <1% + the I/J/Z-plex not already in that <1%.
[*] ooops) antiwar,Apologies; Serbs, the new matériel is Croatian.txt
3)
aletheia ·
The psyop; it always pays to ask
cui bono? Intro:
Consider the concept of "Airstrip One." a) What would become today's
I/J/Z-plex wanted an homeland to escape widespread persecution (one has
to ask "Why?" - as in why were they persecuted = what did they do to
attract same?) - and b) 1st England, then America wanted oil. Not 'just'
oil, note, but control over oil (to exclude perceived 'competitors'
like currently R&C, say), and 'vertical integration' of the oil
business, to be masters of oil from the sand to the sales-point =
'harvesting' as much of the economic rent that they could get,
neglecting any/almost all claims by sovereign owners to same. Proof =
open your eyes and look.
But criminals can't afford to be too
obvious, and will always work behind a screen of (planned, hoped)
deception. It is known that IL wants to expand beyond all reason; the
original partition was never enough (one blogger repeatedly raves: "Up
to the Litani River!") - specifically here, they want the Golan Heights
and more, they *always* want to attack - and slaughter - any/all
perceived 'enemies,' up to and including Iran. All should know this by
now; proof = again, open your eyes and look.
Since the ME
oil-sands mostly lie under Arab/Muslims, they become the US, UK &
IL's 'natural' enemies (makes it tough to be an Arab/Muslim, no matter
how innocent). But by the 'hiding behind lies' rule, it's hard for the
US, UK &/ IL to attack directly - far too obvious, especially after
the utterly disastrous Iraq imbroglio. So they need a proxy; what
*better* than deranged religious jihadi nuts of Al-Qaeda, to attack and
slaughter "their own people?" Same proof.
Argument: But IL made
another of their frequent errors; they attacked the Turkish flagged
ship Mavi Marmara, the IDF brutally killing peace advocates, as is their
wont. This caused a rift with TR, interrupting cooperation in various
nefarious shared activities. Q: How to repair the rift? A: Put it on
Obama, blame it on Obama, give the I/J/Z-plex a little frisson of fear:
Could Obama really dare defy us? Obama is, after all, disposable? Just
as long as the US-M/I/C/$4a†-plex keeps supporting IL and the 'free' (to
IL) guns and $s keep arriving in IL, all is well - for IL (after all,
who could be more important?) This too, the 'smear' on Obama, will pass;
partly thanks to this article - or so the author may hope. But the main
work has been done; IL off the TR-hook and may now use the
people/arms-pipeline through TR to help smash Syria, not caring, as all
the other attackers by proxy don't, how many innocent Syrians get
slaughtered in the process, nor how much damage is done to
infrastructure; main chance is the joint US/Zs' geopolitical objectives
of land- and oil-grabs.
3a)
aletheia ·
Not so much BTW, the quote on the IIS was from loefingstonn on ICH 34426.
[end to come]
Mark Latham approached 'superman' status - until he was elected Lab-leader and possible 'PM to be.'
Most famous line: "A conga line of suckholes!"
To which a common response was "Get a briefing!"
But Latham avoided the briefing - on good grounds (*I surmise*); namely that before a briefing is given, there comes a little address by the briefer(s) along the lines of "The story you are about to hear is true, and if you leak a single detail we'll have you killed, and your children eaten."
(This is the 'fun' bit about people keeping secrets - we (the democratically sovereign people) never get all *critical* details; secrecy is a mortal enemy of democracy.)
Recall that Latham was EGW's anointed successor.
At least three parts of the briefing are significant; a) that Aus economic policy is fixed (within boundaries), as is b) 'defence' ditto fixed, and c) the fixing is by the US and the enforcers are CIA black/psy-operators.
This totally removed Latham's raison d'etre, and his collapse began on the spot. This *theory* explains pretty-well all there is to explain - and not just about Latham.